More on Tom DeLay's book attacking the "slimy" Clintons. Some urban legends, like spitting on Vietnam Veterans can be proven false but if people want to believe, they are going to believe no matter.
This site is typical of the low level to which many libs will go to poison the minds of the uninformed or the uneducated.
Living in Arkansas and knowing the TRUE depths to which the liberal political power base here stoops to control the electorate just proves the adage deeply steeped in tradition in the South, which is obviously spreading across the country with the "dumbing-down" in the educating of our children..."If the Democratic party resorts to putting up a 'yellow dog' to run for an office, the mind-numbed robot voters will vote for it."
That sums up the state of all things political involving the "Win at all cost Liberals" who will produce such slop as this take on Rush Limbaugh.
Rush is number one because he does speak the truth and liberals will do anything and say anything to besmirch someone who makes them uncomfortable in their own skin. I have debated enough of them myself to know.
I have listened to Rush since the dark days of '92 when the biggest joke on America was introduced to the American electorate....when "slick" won the election, the dye was cast sadly as to the direction the nation would take...immorality would be embraced by that growing segment of society which does not want to be judged for their actions.
Everything you have used in this smearing was taken out of context..and I should know as I have listened to Rush ....you, however have not. You have edited what you wanted to use to slander and that tells me all I need to know....someone filled sadly with hate.
This site is intended to influence those who will not take the time to seek honest information and the whole world will suffer, not just America.
Your reaction to what I will now say will define your core belief when I say......, "God forgive you for hurting America with this deceitful site."
Well, I listened to/ endured Rush during the time period of the election you're dithering on about, and for a couple of years on either side of the election as well. I didn't do it by choice, mind you, a co-worker had him on every day of the week.
It is hard to see how this man identified with Limbaugh. He was nearly everything Limbaugh is not. Working class (at times) mostly unemployed, drug abuser, more about that later!, extremely non-conservative in dress, demeanor,and lifestyle, and no aspirations or chance
of living in the world Rush inhabits. Still, oddly - he seemed to identify with him somehow.
I sensed that he bought into the feeling that Rush in some way represented a fellowship of sorts. Uppity women, (he was working for one - me),
oppression of the working man, (though how Rush embodied that, is beyond comprehension), it was easy for him to buy the idea that the world was going to hell in a handbasket due to crooked politicians, and to the ignorant, why not follow right along that they were the Liberal ones. No thinking, just find a way to identify with Rush.
I've implied Rush is evil, not stupid.
"Slick" is as honest as the day is long, compared to the machine working against him, Starr and Gingrich leading the charge, with mouthpieces like Rush deliverng their message. Each, including Rush has since proven to the
public at large that their stance of
morality and family values were nothing
more than words which the gullible swallowed whole.
BTW, just why is it that we're not receiving the Limbaugh broadcast from
a state pen? I do believe it was he,
who had spoken so many times about
useless druggies and what fate should
befall them. I seem to recall that those who broke drug laws should be
"sent up the river for life".
Rush went up the river, in a tour boat.
A couple of weeks in a nice rehab center, skip the slap on the wrist, and
the windbag was back on the air, no
excuses, no extenuating circumstances.
Others do not get this opportunity, as
they would have been handcuffed and slapped into the county jail awaiting
the judge..much like the individual I
mentioned earlier.
To even imply that HE represents "honest" anything, much less information speaks volumes of you, and others who gleefully chuckle along with the hypocritical fathead...so welcome to the
club.
While waiting for the true object of your
ire to answer, may I remind you that of
late your resource for news and truth
has taken to billing himself as
"comedian Rush Limbaugh".
This, I presume covers all of the abject
lies this excuse for sorry humanity tells,after being called on them far too many times.
I'll agree, in first grade parlance,
Rush IS "number one".
The premise of your comment is a bastardization of Christianity by our home grown Taliban.
Morality is not based upon Sex.
As Jesus said, its mostly about loving one another and reaching out to the least of us.
What did Jesus say about sex? Nothing.
It was Paul the writer, who spent most of his life as a libertine debaucher, had an epiphany, and traveled the world corrupting to preach that all sex was all bad. Which old women liked to hear!
And here we are. I player in that bastardization of Christianity.
Living in Arkansas and knowing the TRUE depths to which the liberal political power base here stoops to control the electorate just proves the adage deeply steeped in tradition in the South, which is obviously spreading across the country with the "dumbing-down" in the educating of our children..."If the Democratic party resorts to putting up a 'yellow dog' to run for an office, the mind-numbed robot voters will vote for it."
That sums up the state of all things political involving the "Win at all cost Liberals" who will produce such slop as this take on Rush Limbaugh.
Rush is number one because he does speak the truth and liberals will do anything and say anything to besmirch someone who makes them uncomfortable in their own skin. I have debated enough of them myself to know.
I have listened to Rush since the dark days of '92 when the biggest joke on America was introduced to the American electorate....when "slick" won the election, the dye was cast sadly as to the direction the nation would take...immorality would be embraced by that growing segment of society which does not want to be judged for their actions.
Everything you have used in this smearing was taken out of context..and I should know as I have listened to Rush ....you, however have not. You have edited what you wanted to use to slander and that tells me all I need to know....someone filled sadly with hate.
This site is intended to influence those who will not take the time to seek honest information and the whole world will suffer, not just America.
Your reaction to what I will now say will define your core belief when I say......, "God forgive you for hurting America with this deceitful site."
It is hard to see how this man identified with Limbaugh. He was nearly everything Limbaugh is not. Working class (at times) mostly unemployed, drug abuser, more about that later!, extremely non-conservative in dress, demeanor,and lifestyle, and no aspirations or chance
of living in the world Rush inhabits. Still, oddly - he seemed to identify with him somehow.
I sensed that he bought into the feeling that Rush in some way represented a fellowship of sorts. Uppity women, (he was working for one - me),
oppression of the working man, (though how Rush embodied that, is beyond comprehension), it was easy for him to buy the idea that the world was going to hell in a handbasket due to crooked politicians, and to the ignorant, why not follow right along that they were the Liberal ones. No thinking, just find a way to identify with Rush.
I've implied Rush is evil, not stupid.
"Slick" is as honest as the day is long, compared to the machine working against him, Starr and Gingrich leading the charge, with mouthpieces like Rush deliverng their message. Each, including Rush has since proven to the
public at large that their stance of
morality and family values were nothing
more than words which the gullible swallowed whole.
BTW, just why is it that we're not receiving the Limbaugh broadcast from
a state pen? I do believe it was he,
who had spoken so many times about
useless druggies and what fate should
befall them. I seem to recall that those who broke drug laws should be
"sent up the river for life".
Rush went up the river, in a tour boat.
A couple of weeks in a nice rehab center, skip the slap on the wrist, and
the windbag was back on the air, no
excuses, no extenuating circumstances.
Others do not get this opportunity, as
they would have been handcuffed and slapped into the county jail awaiting
the judge..much like the individual I
mentioned earlier.
To even imply that HE represents "honest" anything, much less information speaks volumes of you, and others who gleefully chuckle along with the hypocritical fathead...so welcome to the
club.
ire to answer, may I remind you that of
late your resource for news and truth
has taken to billing himself as
"comedian Rush Limbaugh".
This, I presume covers all of the abject
lies this excuse for sorry humanity tells,after being called on them far too many times.
I'll agree, in first grade parlance,
Rush IS "number one".
Gee!!
Gosh...
I don't know where to begin?
RJ
Morality is not based upon Sex.
As Jesus said, its mostly about loving one another and reaching out to the least of us.
What did Jesus say about sex? Nothing.
It was Paul the writer, who spent most of his life as a libertine debaucher, had an epiphany, and traveled the world corrupting to preach that all sex was all bad. Which old women liked to hear!
And here we are. I player in that bastardization of Christianity.
RJ
Frontpage - Top level