Kick! Making Politics Fun
A liberal dose of political humor

These pages are the best from the website Conservtively Incorrect
Custom Search

Gay Rights
Talking Points
Good source of debate material by category
Law & Order
Guns NRA
The BJ
George W

oil pelican

The Environment


Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees.” Revelation 7:3


I apologize for the brevity of this area. Though this is the single most important issue of humanity, I can find very little either funny or witty about it to comment upon. Sadly, it is a  problem concerning our short-term vision which is sure to do us all in.


    Wise Use


The largest block of PAC money to GOP House members - $7.5 million - comes from anti-environmental businesses.


The term Wise Use was coined by Ron Arnold in the late 1980’s for what he admits is “its ambiguous sound bite quality.” Arnold, a disgruntled Sierra Club member moved to the hard Right in 1981 co-authoring At the Eye of the Storm, an anti-environmental book overflowing with endorsement of then Interior Secretary James Watt. In 1989 Arnold teamed up with the premier conservative fundraiser Alan Gottlieb and together they began funding the Wise Use Movement and it’s three basic tenants: 


1)      Removing present environmental protections.

2)      Preventing future environmental legislation.

3)      To benefit the economic interests of it’s members.


Wise Use is not an organization but an umbrella movement networking over 400 individual anti-environmental groups many of which masquerade as pro-environmentalists to both confuse the issues and to get contributions from people who are unaware of what they are really up to. So be careful where your environmental donations are going. Do some research.


The most well known spokesperson for Wise Use is a piggish radio propagandist who has spent literally thousands of hours on the air defining environmentalists as Marxist Whackos out to destroy capitalism, democracy and our American way of life. The hum of the attacks dwell on the new pejorative concerning the word watermelon: Green on the outside Red on the inside. This keeps it all in step with the overall conservative outlook; anyone who cares about anything other than themselves is defined as an anti-American socialist.


Their next ace in the hole was Limbaugh’s anti-environmentalist mentor, the now good and dead premier anti-environmentalist in America, Dixy Lee Ray, who once headed the Atomic Energy Commission and was once governor of Washington. Her books and speech titles portend a pro-environment outlook while the body of her work is always in unwavering defense of the timber, mining, chemical, cattle, corporate-farm and fishery industries.


There is a great deal of similarity between wise use and creation science, though the latter is based upon anti-science and the former on pseudo-science, their common denominator is they attack science/scientists by painting them as evil know-nothings in a conspiracy to destroy the American way of life. Ray, Limbaugh and a host of conservatives dwell on two aspects concerning the environment in the same way Creation Science advocates use. Just as scientists cannot prove evolution in the absolute, neither can science prove the actual mechanism of global warming or ozone depletion in the absolute. Then they both use the anti-scientific method to come to their already arrived at conclusion; evolution, global warming, and the ozone hole are not only lies, but nonsense.


I am sure many of you had never heard of Wise Use before, but it’s largest most successful and most funded facet you see most everyday. Full page glossy ads in magazines, major spots on television and PBS credits from the most grievous polluters on the planet, all telling us how environmentally aware they are. They sink a million dollars in publicity to help some single popular cause while doing billions of dollars in environmental damage in a hundred other areas. These large corporations also feed so much propaganda and fear of environmentalism into their millions of employees, that they too have become anti-environmentalists in the hopes of hanging on to their jobs, when by far their greatest worry should be losing those jobs when the corporation kicks them out the door on their asses to move the operation offshore.


How can the intelligent American public fall for all this crap? The idea of Wise Use hit the conservative think tanks with Reagan and Watt in the early 80’s; it became an organized entity in 1989 and reached the billion-dollar mark in funding in 1991. Here follows what I hope is the blow you away fact of their success.

TIME/CNN POLL: Have environmentalists gone too far?


·        1991 17% answered yes.

·        1992 51% answered yes.


Follows a partial list of some of the national players and their funding, beware there are many more local and national hard-core anti-environmental organizations flying the banner of environmentalism to confuse the American public:



·        ALLIANCE FOR AMERICA - Timber/chemical/mining


·        AMERICAN FREEDOM COALITION - Unification Church

·        AIM - Reed Irvine - Timber/chemical

·        CATO INSTITUTE - Libertarian Timber/chemical

·        CITIZENS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT- Timber/chemical

·        CHRISTIAN COALITION - Pat Robertson


·        CONSUMER ALERT - Timber/chemical/mining front group


·        FRIENDS OF THE RIVERS - Off road vehicles

·        EVERGREEN FOUNDATION - Champion Paper

·        GLOBAL CLIMATE COALITION - Myth of Global warming

·        HERITAGE FOUNDATION - Coors, chemical, GM, GE


·        INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE - Land developers

·        KEEP AMERICA BEAUTIFUL - Packaging

·        LYNDON LAROUCHE - Rabid Anti-environmentalism

·        NATIONAL WETLANDS COALITION - Land developers

·        PEOPLE FOR THE WEST! - Mining/cattle

·        PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST - Rabid Animal Rights haters

·        THE REASON FOUNDATION -Libertarian anti-environmental

·        SAHARA CLUB - Off road vehicles

·        SEA LION DEFENSE FUND - Alaskan fisheries  




“Population growth is the primary source of environmental damage.” Jacques Cousteau


There are many problems in the World today, but put them all together and they don’t hold a candle to this one. Because of this, there is no greater human enemy to the environment than the Pope (any Pope), who with malice aforethought not only decrees no birth control be used by his billion constituents, but tells Catholic families to have as many children as they can resulting in the starvation of millions and social upheavals killing millions more. Look pal, if you feel you must wear a dildo on your head, at least but a rubber on it




    The World in a Nutshell


“At least if we don’t close down the Environmental Protection Agency, we at least put a snaffle bit on them and ride the pony down. (Dick Armey (R-TX)


I no longer know where I got this but felt it important to include. If we could shrink the Earth’s population to a village of precisely 100 people, with all existing human ratios remaining the same, it would look like this:


·     There would be 57 Asians, 21 Europeans, 14 from the Western Hemisphere (North &    South) and 8 Africans.

·     51 would be female; 49 would be male.

·     70 would be nonwhite.

·     70 would be non-Christian.

·     50% of the entire world’s wealth would be in the hands of only 6 people and all 6 would be from the United States.

·     80 would live in substandard housing.

·     70 would be unable to read.

·     50 would suffer from malnutrition.

·     1 would be near death.

·     2 would be near birth.

·     1 would have a college education.  




   Global Warning 101


The United States with 5% of the world population and is responsible for 25% of the pollution.


The Sun sends out infrared radiation which warms our planet. Water vapor (clouds and humidity) and carbon dioxide are responsible for holding in the vast majority of heat along with much smaller amounts of methane and such, these are what we call greenhouse gases. Through the process of photosynthesis ocean plankton, forests and crops remove carbon dioxide from the air and turn it into oxygen (contrary to what Ronald Reagan may say) while in turn giving back carbon dioxide through the process of respiration. Clouds, humidity, volcanoes and the working of plant life make up about 98% of the Greenhouse gases that there is nothing to be done about, The remaining 2% is driven by humans which there can be something done about. I would suppose the conservative thinking on the matter is that that 2% doesn’t matter unless it represents a tax reduction for them.   


Carbon dioxide has almost doubled in our atmosphere since the industrial revolution. And the planet’s temperature has risen about one degree with a subsequent seven-inch rise in sea level. All glaciers are melting at an accelerating rate. It takes about a hundred years for carbon dioxide to dissipate in the atmosphere. So we are left with the old serious worries; weather changes, agricultural disruption and rising sea levels displacing perhaps a billion people in a few hundred years, to the new serious worry that projections regarding the recent acceleration of the processes may cause havoc in a few years.


Conservatives will do their best to try and deny even the proven facts of the matter, so you can imagine what they do with conjecture regarding computer models. 2500 scientists from around the world with no ax to grind other than giving a shit about something other than their portfolio, stand by the facts of the matter, and the logic behind it. It is not all that complicated; reduce the rate of greenhouse gas emissions to that of 1990. This means that we will have to reduce it by 10% over the next five years.


Japan and the European communities are asking that it be reduced by 15%. Republicans and the oil lobby are making a big stink. They say it will not only destroy our economy, but it is not fair to allow developing countries a more gradual reduction rate than the industrialized nations (read non-Christian non-White). They have won of course as one of the very first things Cowboy George did was pull the United States (the greatest energy user and polluter in the world) out of the Kyoto Treaty.


This is all very reminiscent of the tobacco lobby and their denial that nicotine is addictive. The oil and auto industries are going to deny global warning from their high-rise offices even as waves lap against their ankles.


Global warming is not only about rising sea levels, and changes in the weather patterns, but the subsequent increase in infectious diseases such as malaria, cholera and yellow fever, which kills mostly children. Anyone who would shill against saving the lives of sick children can be referred to as a Baby Murderer.  




   Where’s Dorothy?


It isn’t pollution that’s harming the environment. It’s the impurities in our air and water that are doing it.” Vice President Dan Quayle


The characters are beginning to define themselves. Our new national environmentalist, Gail Norton is the Wicked Witch of the West directing her swarm of cadaverous flying monkeys to sell lead paint, remove wheel chair ramps, and destroy forests. The two now in charge are a Straw man in need of a brain and his underling Tin man in dire need of a heart. Where’s Dorothy with a couple buckets of water and a match?




    Our Friends the Animals


“There is a socialist agenda... Environmentalists are the most despicable group of individuals... A self-centered bunch, a waffle-stomping, Harvard-graduating, intellectual bunch of idiots.” Chairman of the House Resources Committee, Don Young (R-ASS)


For the well being of our planet it is imperative that we keep our environment sound. We must conserve our energy and water, reduce our use of chemicals and pollutants, and most importantly, hold to the ecological balance of our planet by ensuring the well being of our animal life. Whether they be butterflies, wabbits, bears, rats, skunks, garden slugs or conservatives, we must both protect them and keep them from destroying that balance by over population.


After recently doing a study of the animalistic nature of conservatives, I sat down in front of the television with my pal Mr. Beam and surfed the talking heads with the Houston Chronicle and a Newsweek in my lap. At first it was uneventful, I would shake my head repeatedly thinking this and deciphering that, but as Mr. Beam leveled down, so did my brain. I was soon making emotional responses to whatever the issue happened to be. Along with many growls and spits, I found myself zinging off guttural snarls of: Fuck them, Screw them all, Shoot the bastards, inject the SOB, bomb the shit out of them, why should I care, damn smart people and my tax money. Once I even found myself standing up and singing America the Beautiful. So the question arises, are half the people in American just drunk on the first Tuesday of November or is this a more serious matter?


sarah palin 2012


The Year That Was Database

1950s Database
1960sThe Sixties
eighties 1980s database


ugly fat man chanting his own name

The Multimedia Years

1960 History
1960 Music
1960 Television
1960 Movies
1960 Books
1960 Gadgets
1960 Sports
1960 Cars

1961 History
1961 Music
1961 Television
1961 Movies
1961 Books
1961 Gadgets
1961 Sports
1961 Cars

1962 History
1962 Music
1962 Television
1962 Movies
1962 Books
1962 Gadgets
1962 Sports
1962 Cars

1963 History
1963 Music
1963 Television
1963 Movies
1963 Books
1963 Gadgets
1963 Sports
1963 Cars

1964 History
1964 Music
1964 Television
1964 Movies
1964 gadgets
1964 Books
1964 Sports
1964 Cars

1965 History
1965 Music
1965 Television
1965 Movies
1965 gadgets
1965 Books
1965 Sports
1965 Cars

1966 History
1966 Music
1966 Television
1966 Movies
1966 gadgets
1966 Books
1966 Sports
1966 Cars

1967 History
1967 Music
1967 Television
1967 Movies
1967 gadgets
1967 Books
1967 Sports
1967 Cars

1968 History
1968 Music
1968 Movies
1968 Television
1968 gadgets
1968 Books
1968 Sports
1968 Cars

1969 History
1969 Music
1969 Movies
1969 Television
1969 gadgets
1969 Books
1969 Sports
1969 Cars

1971 History

1971 Music
1971 Television
1971 Movies
1971 Books
1971 Sports
1971 Cars
1971 Gadgets

1973 History
1973 Music
1973 Television
1973 Movies
1973 Books
1973 Gadgets
1973 Sports
1973 Cars

1975 history

1975 books
1975 cars
1975 gadgets
1975 movies
1975 music
1975 sports
1975 tv

1977 history
1977 books
1977 cars
1977 gadgets
1977 movies
1977 music
1977 sports
1977 tv

1979 history
1979 books
1979 cars
1979 gadgets
1979 movies
1979 music
1979 sports
1979 tv

1950 History
1950 Music
1950 Television
1950 Movies
1950 Books
1950 Gadgets
1950 Sports
1950 Cars

1951 History
1951 music
1951 Television
1951 Movies
1951 Books
1951 Gadgets
1951 Sports
1951 Cars

1952 History
1952 Music
1952 Television
1952 Movies
1952 Books
1952 Gadgets
1952 Sports
1952 Cars

1953 History
1953 music
1953 Television
1953 Movies
1953 Books
1953 Gadgets
1953 Sports
1953 Cars

1954 History
1954 music
1954 Television
1954 Movies
1954 books
1954 Gadgets
1954 Sports
1954 Cars

1955 History
1955 music
1955 Television
1955 Movies
1955 Books
1955 Gadgets
1955 Sports
1955 Cars

1956 History
1956 Music
1956 Television
1956 Movies
1956 Books
1956 Gadgets
1956 Sports
1956 Cars

1957 History
1957 music
1957 Television
1957 Movies
1957 Books
1957 Gadgets
1957 Sports
1957 Cars

1958 History
1958 Music
1958 Television
1958 Movies
1958 Books
1958 Gadgets
1958 Sports
1958 Cars

1959 History
1959 Music
1959 Television
1959 Movies
1959 Books
1959 Gadgets
1959 Sports
1959 Cars

1980 History
1980 Music
1980 Television
1980 Movies
1980 Books
1980 Gadgets
1980 Sports
1980 Cars

1981 History
1981 music
1981 Television
1981 Movies
1981 Books
1981 Gadgets
1981 Sports
1981 Cars

1982 History
1982 Music
1982 Television
1982 Movies
1982 Books
1982 Gadgets
1982 Sports
1982 Cars

1983 History
1983 music
1983 Television
1983 Movies
1983 Books
1983 Gadgets
1983 Sports
1983 Cars

1984 History
1984 music
1984 Television
1984 Movies
1984 Books
1984 Gadgets
1984 Sports
1984 Cars



a liberal dose of liberal political humor, satire, opinion and puerile namecalling

Kick!  Making Politics Fun

Hard Response (c) Copyright 1993-2011