The consensus is that this is strange stuff. First thoughts come with it not cheating or adultery or a very serious matter. But reflecting further one finds something amiss in the man. Perhaps just an innocent addiction? That seems to be it when we realize sexting ruined his life and he kept doing it anyway.
When it comes right down to it though, it’s more about an inflated ego covering insecurity. I see this Weiner as a skinny unattractive man who got sand kicked in his face, but by the Grace of God ended up with a big Schlong. So he uses size to compensate. He believes dick size is what the ladies want. Which in his own mind changes him from an undesirable little dork to a big strong attractive man. So what’s the matter with that? Not much really. After all he does it with sexting rather than gunning.
I have a gun and it aint teenie, it makes up for my little wienie.
I googled penis size just now and found this link to be the most believable. Does penis size matter.
BTW, I cannot find any information on the George Costanza problem of getting caught with your pants down in the cold. We men see lots of flaccid dicks in locker rooms and lots of hard ones in prom, neither concerns the reality of where we fit in. Women see it differently, up close and personal if you will.
What personally find distressing is how little is said about the discriminatory STEP effect – Soft To Erect Percentage. Some men can have a STEP effect of well over 500% while others have a STEP effect of less than 100%. When caught with one’s pants down on a cold day it is very unfair, discriminatory, prejudice and bigoted to judge a man by his flaccidity.
This is something I learned from experience one cold Halloween night when I made the rounds of college parties as a flasher. It is an easy costume. Cut off the legs of an old pair of pants, tie them above the new, put on a pair of shoes and put on a long bathrobe that goes below the knees. This is a test to see if anyone ever gets this far down to read anything I write….