It is of course the most convoluted amendment we have, why not just say, the right of the individual to have a gun shall not be infringed, why preface it will a bunch of excuses?
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
And what about the Republican / Conservative demand for original intent of the constitution when at the time it was written their world was one shot a minute rather than 50 shots a minute?
Back I come to the same old question. What are the assault rifles for? Certainly not for shooting down commercial airliners, or shooting at people suspected of dropping off bomb laden backpacks, or to carry them into every restaurant, bar, store, workplace, or for patrolling every street corner in American, or fighting off more than a dozen home invaders at a time. If not that then what?
We know the answer. To shoot as many Negroes, Mexicans, liberals and liberal directed police and troops as possible in the shortest span of time.
How about…
A WAR ON GUNS