We haven’t seen much of Andrew Brietbart since we added a new term to our American lexicon. "Brietbarting" meaning dishonest editing to make a thing seem to say the opposite of what it really says. Not just a lie, but a lie so profound it creates an anti-truth.
As you can see from this debate, conservative Amy Holmes is schooled well in the semantics of Republican talking points. On the other hand, the first thing out of Andrew Brietbart’s smashmouth is an admission that he is immoral. Who would have guessed? And that he sees nothing wrong with throwing sick children out the door because it cuts into insurance companies free market profits. Libertarian priorities. Republicans kill children
And not to give Amy Holmes a free ride, her defense is that denying sick children insurance is the moral equivalent of causing unemployment. Which was caused by George W. Bush and the Republicans.
But the point of this video is to get a good look into what a truly disgusting piece of human crap Andrew Brietbart is. Ugly is as ugly does.
You can see why Brietbart is being kept under his rock until after November 2nd. The GOP already has more than enough ugly smashmouth a holes to deal with, why pander to the worst of the bunch?